The community around meteorology has changed a lot in the last few years. I'll report back in a month. I've been at this for a while now and still feel like a beginner.
This deserves its own thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This deserves its own thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
copper-fern-91 wrote:
That's fair.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
pale-moth-30 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
wry-yarrow-19 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Second this.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Could you share a photo?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Good question, following.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Second this.
hollow-wren-89 wrote:
Second this.
The cheap option was fine for years.
mossy-wren-51 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Second this.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Good question, following.
tidal-rowan-21 wrote:
Good question, following.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Same experience here.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
bright-sparrow-81 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
woven-sparrow-73 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
woven-clover-70 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
misty-sedge-93 wrote:
woven-clover-70 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
woven-otter-4 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Could you share a photo?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
bright-lichen-56 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Small correction, but the point stands.
hollow-willow-50 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
Second this.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This deserves its own thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
hollow-yarrow-69 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
quiet-birch-78 wrote:
Second this.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
late-finch-62 wrote:
Second this.
Saving this for later.
late-finch-62 wrote:
Second this.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
late-finch-62 wrote:
Second this.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Could you share a photo?
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Saving this for later.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
wry-yarrow-26 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Second this.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
wry-rowan-5 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
amber-otter-16 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Saving this for later.
Second this.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Could you share a photo?
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
copper-sparrow-22 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Saving this for later.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.