I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck. Photos and details in the replies if people want them. Photos and details in the replies if people want them.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
This deserves its own thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Saving this for later.
Saving this for later.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Same experience here.
bright-yarrow-75 wrote:
Same experience here.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
wild-clover-60 wrote:
Saving this for later.
The cheap option was fine for years.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
bright-pine-96 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
rustling-otter-0 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Saving this for later.
gentle-birch-1 wrote:
rustling-otter-0 wrote:
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This deserves its own thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
rustling-otter-0 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
rustling-otter-0 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
woven-sparrow-68 wrote:
rustling-otter-0 wrote:
Second this.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
rustling-otter-0 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Second this.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
mossy-clover-71 wrote:
Second this.
This deserves its own thread.
mossy-clover-71 wrote:
Second this.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Saving this for later.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Saving this for later.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Could you share a photo?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Second this.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
dusky-birch-95 wrote:
That's fair.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This deserves its own thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Could you share a photo?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Good question, following.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
This deserves its own thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
misty-hazel-19 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Saving this for later.
slow-rowan-10 wrote:
Saving this for later.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Good question, following.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Saving this for later.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Could you share a photo?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
wild-sparrow-17 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Same experience here.
pale-willow-48 wrote:
Same experience here.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
slow-beech-3 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
copper-yarrow-42 wrote:
slow-beech-3 wrote:
Good question, following.
Saving this for later.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Same experience here.
The official docs are better than they look.
dusky-clover-40 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
misty-reed-81 wrote:
dusky-clover-40 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Saving this for later.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
rustling-thistle-32 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Good question, following.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
This deserves its own thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This deserves its own thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
copper-moth-82 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Good question, following.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.