wireleaf

programming.testing

A question about testing terminology

sunlit-rowan-23

Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do.

Most advice I find online contradicts itself.

Log in or sign up to reply.

sunlit-reed-63

Could you share a photo?

sunlit-rowan-705 more

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

dusky-yarrow-721 more

sunlit-rowan-70 wrote:

Do you have a source for that?

Good question, following.

bright-heron-80

The official docs are better than they look.

dusky-lichen-631 more

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

woven-otter-4

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

gentle-moth-59

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

wry-hazel-44

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

quiet-lichen-83

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.

quiet-thistle-57

Second this.

pale-pine-2

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.

tidal-alder-711 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

pale-beech-77

tidal-alder-71 wrote:

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

amber-hazel-952 more

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

bright-yarrow-211 more

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.

mossy-clover-57

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

tidal-beech-241 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

bright-rowan-30

Saving this for later.

quiet-lichen-25

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

wild-birch-331 more

Same experience here.

late-moth-90

wild-birch-33 wrote:

Same experience here.

Same experience here.

slow-heron-83

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

wild-sparrow-372 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

late-sedge-47

Good question, following.

copper-pine-36

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

late-reed-81

Second this.

silver-thistle-17

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.