internet.browsers.engines.gosub
pale-beech-821 more
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
silver-thistle-85
pale-beech-82 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
still-reed-5
The cheap option was fine for years.
copper-yarrow-641 more
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
late-hazel-46
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
silver-sparrow-46
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
amber-yarrow-6414 more
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
rustling-lichen-101 more
amber-yarrow-64 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Same experience here.
mossy-lichen-66
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
rustling-birch-756 more
amber-yarrow-64 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
misty-thistle-86
rustling-birch-75 wrote:
amber-yarrow-64 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
slow-otter-312 more
This deserves its own thread.
slow-wren-851 more
Small correction, but the point stands.
rustling-birch-41
Second this.
still-heron-681 more
rustling-birch-75 wrote:
amber-yarrow-64 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
still-finch-49
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
quiet-reed-71
amber-yarrow-64 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
silver-lichen-191 more
amber-yarrow-64 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
silver-otter-24
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
copper-hazel-681 more
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
dusky-moth-26
Good question, following.