wireleaf

sci.linguistics

Anyone near Portland into linguistics?

mossy-thistle-94

Log in or sign up to reply.

amber-rowan-44

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.

amber-clover-783 more

Small correction, but the point stands.

bright-lichen-92

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

amber-sparrow-311 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

silver-reed-74

amber-sparrow-31 wrote:

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Good question, following.

mossy-clover-723 more

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.

mossy-pine-99

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

misty-willow-141 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

silver-wren-87

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.

woven-willow-251 more

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.

late-otter-99

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

still-moth-18

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

copper-yarrow-421 more

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

wild-sedge-24

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

gentle-sedge-911 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

pale-otter-12

gentle-sedge-91 wrote:

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

Good question, following.

still-finch-49

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

misty-beech-95

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

woven-thistle-59

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.

pale-birch-141 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

dusky-birch-23

pale-birch-14 wrote:

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Ha, I thought I was the only one.