wireleaf

sci.biology.ecology

Help: stuck with ecology en.wikipedia.org

quiet-reed-42

Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested. This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.

Log in or sign up to reply.

pale-fern-267 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

amber-hazel-10

pale-fern-26 wrote:

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

The cheap option was fine for years.

copper-willow-255 more

This deserves its own thread.

pale-sparrow-794 more

copper-willow-25 wrote:

This deserves its own thread.

Good question, following.

dusky-heron-48

pale-sparrow-79 wrote:

copper-willow-25 wrote:

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.

misty-sedge-83

Second this.

still-beech-231 more

pale-sparrow-79 wrote:

copper-willow-25 wrote:

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

rustling-reed-40

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

copper-rowan-31

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

tidal-reed-67

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

misty-reed-815 more

Second this.

wild-finch-89

Good question, following.

pale-wren-393 more

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

quiet-willow-54

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

amber-hazel-24

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

tidal-thistle-44

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

rustling-rowan-40

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

misty-alder-93

Saving this for later.

misty-wren-57

Saving this for later.

hollow-reed-21 more

Second this.

pale-otter-6

Second this.

slow-yarrow-44

Second this.

hollow-clover-7

The cheap option was fine for years.

pale-otter-952 more

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

pale-willow-921 more

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.

slow-lichen-64

pale-willow-92 wrote:

Start small and stay consistent.

The official docs are better than they look.

mossy-clover-851 more

Could you share a photo?

wry-pine-18

The official docs are better than they look.

woven-moth-43

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.